Category Archives: manners

Clingy & Possessive 2.5yo

Posted on by
9

Hi Faith! I have been thinking over the past 10 days that I am sure you could shed some light on what is happening with my 2 1/2 yo. son. I stay at home with him and there have been no changes to routine or the environment that I can detect. In the past my son has been friendly and charming when around others that live in the home (dad, older sister, and grandmother) but over the past 10 days or so it is as if a switch has been flipped. He now tells people to “go away!” when I talk to them. He is very possessive of me. I try to keep conversations short but he still would rather me not carry on with anyone at all! I want to teach him to “share mama” but I also want to listen to his needs and give all of myself to him. Do you have any idea what is happening? Is this common at this age? How should I react when he screams at me to stop talking to others or cries when other are around? Sincerely, ML Continue reading →

Raise a Balanced Child

Posted on by
Reply

One of the things that we can do to help our children find their place in in the world is to help them to become well-balanced. A wonderful way to think of this is in terms of virtues. Do they talk too much and dominate the conversation? Being eloquent is a virtue, but it needs to be balanced out by the virtue of empathy, so they can learn to ask questions of others, and listen to their responses. Or you could think of it being balanced out by a sense of fairness, that they learn to take turns leading the conversation. So, instead of trying to squash down their talkativeness, we raise them up in another area so that they can excel in their talking AND their listening. Continue reading →

The Foundation of Social Interactions

Posted on by
1

The foundation of positive social interactions between children is to teach them to notice how other children are receiving their actions, and to listen to each others’ requests. 


Noticing How Others React         
The first piece of this is to help youngsters start to notice both positive and negative responses to their actions.  This is especially important when children are touching one another, as it’s often hard for young kids to realize what the results of their actions will be, especially the under-twos, who often like the feeling of grabbing or hitting.  I know one little boy who always wanted to hug his friends, but it often turned into a death-grip, leading the recipient of the hug to struggle, and both children fall down.   He wanted to connect with others but doesn’t know how.  I worked with him for a long time, teaching him to do a quick hug-and-release.  When he was successful, I’d say, “Look, she’s smiling!  She liked that!”  Or, if it went on too long, I’d say, “Oh no.  She’s pushing you away.  She’s saying, ’please stop.’”  Eventually, he was able to notice on his own whether others liked it, and others were able to say “please stop” on her own. 
          Note:  this technique for death-grip-hugs will only work if what he’s wanting is connection.  If what he’s actually wanting is physical stimulation, it’s much more effective to pick him up and spin him around, hang him upside-down, or lay him on the floor and roll him over and over across the room.  That way he can get what he’s looking for from someone who is enjoying the interaction.


Listening to Requests
        The other piece to the foundation of positive social interactions is to make sure that children respond to their friends’ requests.  The biggest piece of this is to listen for whenever a child is saying “Stop,” and make sure that the other child stops.  At Rainbow Bridge, STOP MEANS TAKE YOUR HANDS AWAY.  So, I keep my ears sharply tuned, and whenever I hear someone saying ‘stop’ (or preferably, ‘please stop’), I’ll turn around and watch.  If the child doesn’t stop, I’ll move in and say, “Oh!  I hear Jessie saying stop!”  Then, if they don’t stop, I’ll remind them, “stop means take your hands away.”  And, if they still can’t do it, “It looks like you need some help taking your hands away,” and I’ll help them.  There doesn’t have to be any blame, it’s just them learning to follow the rules, just like any other rules, such as staying at the table while we’re eating, or only going downstairs with an adult.

The Value of Saying "No"

Posted on by
1
         One thing that dramatically affects how much we enjoy the company of a child is how they react when they ask for something and are told “no.” Being able to handle disappointment gracefully is a very advanced skill, and one that doesn’t necessarily come easily or naturally. Nevertheless, having that skill is something that will really serve these little people as they go through life, and will make our enjoyment of them that much richer. So what can we do as parents and caregivers to help children develop this skill?
Avoiding “No”
          Children under two (or even 2 ½) have very little control over their emotions. So the best thing you can do is to avoid establishing negative patterns of tantrums, whining, etc. that will be hard to break when they’re older. Ironically, one of the best ways to do this is to avoid saying “no” as much as possible. One of your biggest tools in this area will be to have a strong daily rhythm. When kids know exactly how things will go, they are much less likely to resist what’s going on or want something different.
          Even with a strong rhythm in place, however, kids at this age want things all the time that they can’t have. So how can you say “no” without saying “no”? One great way is to say “yes” in imagination, and then take them on an imaginary journey that ends somewhere else. Here’s one example I used with a mom just the other day:
Your little boy wants a toy airplane that his older brother is playing with. He winds up to start throwing a fit. You say to him, “You really want that airplane. You want it RIGHT NOW! You LOVE airplanes, and you hate waiting!” Say it really emphatically, so that he knows you ‘get it.’ You might have to say it a few times. When he’s paying attention to you, you can say, “If I had another airplane, I’d give it to you right now.” (you’re saying yes in your imagination.) “If you had an airplane RIGHT NOW, what would you do with it?” He looks at you quizzically. You go on, “If you had that airplane RIGHT NOW, I bet you’d fly it all around the house. What room would you fly it into?” Pause for a moment to let him think about it, then go on, “I bet you’d fly it into the livingroom. Vrrroooommmm! You’d go around the coffee table, the around the couch. Then you’d fly it past the diningroom table! Vrrooommm!” Continue in this vein, taking him on an imaginary journey until you can tell he’s really into it. Then change the direction slightly. “Then you’d fly it past the cat! Do you think she’d like that?” Pause and watch him, then answer: “No! Kitty doesn’t like airplanes at all! If she saw you going by, she might run away and hide!” Then, “In fact, where is kitty? Do you think she’s hiding in the livingroom right now? Let’s go find her!”
Like I said, this technique takes some work, but the more you practice it, the better you get. If you can use this type of distraction and re-direction, you can limit how often you say “no” to your child. And by the way, with a little finesse, this technique can work with older kids as well. It’s time to leave a play-date at the park and your four-year-old doesn’t want to. “You want to stay here forever? OK!” (saying yes in imagination). “That would be funny! What would you eat for dinner? You could ask the squirrels if they would share their nuts with you! And where would you sleep?” Look around. “I know! You could sleep underneath the tire-swing. You could make a big pile of wood chips and burrow into it, just like a little mouse.” You get the picture.
Saying “No”
          By the time kids are approaching three, they’ve usually figured out what works to get you to change your mind when you say “no.” Maybe throwing tantrums has worked well for them. Maybe if they whine long enough you get tired and give in. Or, they’ll explain and explain why you should change your mind, wearing you down until you do change your mind, or they end up in tears.  So how to establish good habits around reacting to being told “no”?
          I know I go against popular culture here, but I believe that children do not benefit from lengthy discussions of why they can’t have what they want. A simple explanation is fine, but after that it simply draws out the bad feelings of being told “no,” and keeps them from moving on. And in practical terms, it greatly increases the amount of time the two of you spend disagreeing with one another. Helping your child to accept “no” gracefully, and move on, will benefit you both. So how do you do that? Well, if your child is used to lengthy explanations, it will take some time and effort to change that pattern.  Be patient and don’t give up.
          Use Humor. When a child asks for something that they know they can’t have, don’t give them a long explanation about how they know they can’t have cookies before dinner. Don’t even be disapproving. From their perspective, it was worth a try, right? So simply laugh while you say no. “No…..Silly girl!” And give her a smooch.  You don’t even have to remind her that she can have one cookie after dinner, just like always. She knows.
          Be Matter-of-Fact. Kids often take their emotional cues from us, so watch your tone.  When a child asks for a sugar cereal in the grocery store, a cheerful “Nope!” or “Not today,” is surprisingly effective, especially if you follow it up with a comment leading them in a different direction. You don’t need to explain about how sugar cereals are bad for you, how they’ll rot your teeth or give you a tummy ache. The less discussion you give it, the faster they can move on. Note: if you have traditionally changed your mind after pleading or nagging in the past, your child will take awhile to change his response. But if you practice, and are consistent that once you’ve said “not today” you don’t change your mind, your child will learn to accept this without question unless it feels really important to him. I say “not today” at Rainbow Bridge all the time, and the children simply accept it and move on. It is part of our culture there.
          Be Empathetic. Sometimes I’ll say “not today,” and a child will burst into tears. I will immediately stop what I’m doing and take them into my arms. “Wow, you really wanted to do that, huh?” I’ll say. “You thought I’d say yes, but then I said no instead.” They’ll nod tearfully. Now, at this point there’s a huge urge to either 1) explain why they can’t get what they want, 2) bargain with them/bribe them with replacement items, or 3) give in. Put all of those urges on hold, and simply give them some love, instead. “I love you sooo much.” Give a kiss on the top of the head, and start humming a song as you rock back and forth. Stay with them as long as they need, simply pouring in the love without trying to solve anything. They are learning to handle disappointment, and that’s a big task! In a minute or two, they’ll calm down. “Would you like to help me unload the dishwasher?” you might ask.
Warmly,
Miss Faith

Why I Don’t Use "Sorry"

Posted on by
8

I don’t have children use the word “Sorry” at Rainbow Bridge. The reason for this is that what we want from the word sorry is very complex: something along the lines of “I feel bad about what I did, I hope you’re not hurt too badly, and I’ll try my best not to do it again.” All of that in one word? The kids who come to my house using the word Sorry rarely seem to be saying any of that when they use the word; it’s simply what you’re supposed to say when you hurt someone. It usually comes out quickly and with little emotion behind it.

Young children live primarily in the will, so instead of words, I have them go straight to action when they hurt someone. After comforting the child who’s hurt, I help the aggressor think of what they can do to help the other child feel better. If they push a child who falls down and bumps their head, they can run and get an ice-pack for the other child (or we’ll all go to get it together, but I’ll hand it to them to give to the hurt child). If a child is hurt less badly, I’ll suggest that they help rub the other child’s back. Sometimes, especially if they hit or bit the other child, the hurt child doesn’t want the perpetrator to touch them yet. In that case I’ll suggest that they find a toy that the hurt child might like. Once the child who’s crying has calmed down some, then I might move to words, depending on how verbal the aggressor is (usually around age 2 ½ or older). I’ll say, “It looks like she’s feeling a little bit better. Why don’t you ask her, ‘Will you be OK?’” Usually the child responds with a yes or a nod. Then, especially if I can tell they feel bad, I’ll suggest that they say, “I didn’t mean to hurt you.” This seems much more specific and relevant than the word “sorry” to me. And, regardless of the circumstances, I think children usually do not mean to hurt one another. Yes, they may have hit the other child, but it seems like it almost always comes as a surprise when the other child bursts into tears as a result. Children at this age are just following their impulses, and they have to learn through repeated experience what the effects of those impulses are, before they can learn to control them.

If the aggressor is old enough (usually starting at age 3 ½ or so), I’ll follow the whole experience up with a brief conversation where I’ll ask them what happened leading up to the incident, and we’ll brainstorm together on what alternatives they might have used. If they wanted a toy that another child had, they could ask if they could use it when they’re done, or they could offer something else as a trade. If the other child was trying to take their toy, they could say ‘you can use it when I’m done,’ or give another toy to that child. If a child wouldn’t get out of their way, they could say ‘excuse me’ or move around the child. If a child was throwing sand on them, they could say, ‘please stop throwing sand.’

And always, I strive to remember that children are doing the best they can with the tools they have. Learning to interact with words is a very complex skill, one that takes several years (or, for some of us, a lifetime!) to learn. We caretakers are here to help teach them these skills, and then help them practice again and again and again.
 
Warmly,
Miss Faith

Mine!

Posted on by
7

From the time they learn to talk, the word “Mine!” often plays a prominent role until a child is three or so. In fact, the first year I started working with toddlers, a sheet of paper was passed around titled “Toddler Property Laws.” It starts out:
       -If I like it, it’s mine.
       -If it’s in my hand, it’s mine.
       -If I can take it away from you, it’s mine.
       -If I had it a little while ago, it’s mine.
It goes on from there, but you get the idea. Everyone who has spent time with toddlers laughs when they read it. As I’ve spent more and more time with toddlers, however, my views on the word mine have changed.  I’ve come to believe that most of the time that a toddler (especially a young toddler) says “mine,” what he’s really doing is expressing recognition of this object, explaining that he has a relationship with it. What do I mean by this? Well, here’s a conversation that I have on a regular basis at Rainbow Bridge. Let’s choose a little girl named Jojo. Jojo sees Sylvia playing with a toy that she recognizes:

Jojo: Mine!
Me: Were you playing with that before?
Jojo: (nod)
Me:  Yes. (pause) You were playing with it, and now it’s Sylvia’s turn. (pause again) Now you’re playing with the dolly.
Jojo looks down at the doll in her hands, then up at me, and nods.

At least half the time, this is the conversation in its entirety. I acknowledge Jojo’s relationship with the toy, then point out what she’s playing with now. This feels satisfying to her, and she goes off to play with her doll. Unfortunately, many times we adults misunderstand toddlers’ limited vocabulary, and assign the meaning that WE would give to the word “mine” when we hear them say it. When a child sees a toy in another child’s hands and says “Mine!”, the adult often refutes them, going on to say who it really belongs to, who’s allowed to play with it when, etc. And often, this ends up with an unhappy child. My idea is that to them, this feels like we’re denying their relationship with that toy, which is completely unjust. They keep trying to explain (by saying “mine!”), and the adult keeps telling them that no, it’s not actually theirs. How frustrating.

On the other hand, sometimes when they say “Mine!” it’s because they see another child playing with a toy and they wish they could play with it. (I have a theory that toys ‘come alive’ to children when they are being played with, which is why toddlers always want a toy that somebody else is playing with.) When that happens, we go through the conversation above, but instead of wandering off, Jojo responds with a firm, “Mine!” Here’s what I do then:

Jojo: Mine!
Me: Do you want another turn with that toy?
Jojo: (nod)
Me: Why don’t you ask her? You can say, “Sylvia, can I have a turn when you’re done?”
Jojo (to Sylvia): Can I have a turn when you’re done?
Sylvia: Yes
Me: She said yes! You can have a turn when she’s done! What will you play with while you wait?

At this point a child usually is happy to find something else while they wait, although sometimes she may need my help to find something that is as “alive” as the toy in Sylvia’s hands. I make another toy come alive by starting to play with it, then offering it to her.

There are a couple of things that can trip up this conversation. One is if Jojo fails to get Sylvia’s attention before she asks, speaks too quietly for Sylvia to hear, or asks me instead of asking Sylvia. If this happens, I’ll either encourage Jojo to get her attention first, or I’ll help: “Sylvia, Jojo has a question for you.” If Jojo is too young or too shy to ask for herself, I’ll position myself right next to her and ask for her: “Sylvia, can Jojo have a turn when you’re done?” Another problem can arise if Jojo asks and then Sylvia says “No.” If this happens, I’ll simply explain to Sylvia, “Oh, she doesn’t mean right now. She means when you’re ALL DONE.” Usually Sylvia is happy to agree with this.

If Sylvia is playing at Jojo’s house, there is another layer to the word “mine.” Then the question of ownership may really be coming into the discussion. In that case, I would reassure Jojo: “Yes. That toy is YOURS. Sylvia’s having a turn with it right now. (pause). What are YOU playing with?”

Certainly it’s clear that the word “mine” can mean different things at different times and in different situations. I don’t know if toddlers really use it to express a relationship to the object, but I do know that when I think of it that way, and I acknowledge it as such, children often seem satisfied with no further action needed. Give it a try!

Warmly,
Miss Faith